You know that something interesting is actually happening in life when I don’t have to recount the monotony on a pathetic blog. That said, life is equally pathetic and so to liven things up, here’s something to think about.
What makes a person? From a very detached, clinical perspective, I shall list the following:
- Personality
- Culture
- Wealth
- Status
- Influence and connections
- Appearance
- “Identity” consisting of name and relations with others; similar to connections
So if one communicates with a person, one communicates with the aggregate of a personality, culture, wealth, status, influence and so forth.
Now, a concept has none of the above, indeed, has no physical properties and thus cannot possess the above, which of many are concepts in themselves. So feelings are concepts. Theories are often concepts. Speculation about something is a concept.
So if I choose a person to think about, in this case, I have arbitrarily chosen a man somewhere in France, if I do not know the person’s personality, appearance, wealth, etc, I am essentially dealing with a concept. I have no idea if this man even exists, or is only in my mind. So to me, all people unknown to me are concepts and not people, or even objects.
Now, what about the internet, television, documentaries, etc? Indeed, they show people, but all they show is appearance. Even so, this is a little of what constitutes a human, and thus they are considered human. That said, all people I have never seen do not exist for me, for the simple reason that if they did exist, then every sort of conceivable person would exist, and that would create a paradox in itself.
So really, what is a person? A person is a fragment of knowledge possessed by another person, in order that the person thought about in fact does exist.
Also, I’m tempted to remove comments or make them have to be approved beforehand. I’m reasonably sure no one wants to know about your idiotic ad-ridden websites geared towards making money for yourself, so go hit yourself with something heavy.